
| Volume 1, Number 3 |
October 1995 |

Rural Transportation: A
Chain With Many Links
The Northeast
is often characterized as a megalopolis: a chain of densely populated habitats strung like
a strand of pearls along the Atlantic Ocean. Large cities are very much a part of the
landscape but so too are the rural areas of the region. Small towns and rural areas have
broad appeal, with a pace and quality of life that have all but vanished in much of urban
America. Some 117 million people live in small towns and rural areas of the Nation. In the
Northeast, Vermont has the highest percentage of rural population (67.9 percent) in the
country. The rural populations of Maine (55.4 percent), New Hampshire (49.0 percent) and
Pennsylvania (31.1 percent) are above the national average (24.8 percent). Each of the
other Northeastern states, no matter how urban, have important rural areas.
Transportation has always been a crucial issue in small towns and rural
areas. Covered bridges are representative of the region's earliest commitment to provide
mobility to people and goods. The thoughtful engineering and craftsmanship are an
important reminder of the need to provide physical links in rural areas.
A rural lifestyle presents special problems of isolation due to the loss of
rural bus and rail service. The Interstate Highway System, while providing important
city-to-city connections, has bypassed much of the rural population. Rural families must
rely almost completely on personal autos and trucks to get to employment, stores,
services, medical facilities, schools and other basic social functions. According to the
1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (conducted by the Federal Highway
Administration), 78.3 percent of the residences in non-metropolitan statistical areas
(msa) did not have any public transportation available. As a result, the average number of
vehicles per household in non-msa tend to be 26 percent higher than in the central city.
A significant number of the nearly 80 percent of the rural population who do
not have access to public transit tend to be older and very often less well off than
people who live in urban areas. The effect of changes in welfare laws that limit auto
ownership by recipients further isolate the rural poor. To help address this problem,
Congress, in 1991, enacted the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)
which includes funding for rural transit agencies, providers of service to the elderly and
disabled, and transit operators in small urbanized areas.
States are attempting to harness the same craftsmanship that produced covered
bridges to design rural transit programs that meet the needs of their citizens. In
undertaking this task, they can learn from thoughtful people in rural Britain and western
Europe, who are taking a second look at the role rail can play in preserving the quality
of rural life.
| Prepared by
the CONEG Policy Research Center, Inc. |
|