October 1, 2001
The Honorable Norman Mineta
Secretary
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 Seventh and D Streets, NW
Washington, DC 20560
Dear Mr. Secretary:
As the Administration considers federal policy and funding support
for intercity passenger rail, we wish to share with you our strong
support for safe, efficient and reliable intercity passenger rail as
part of an integrated, adequately financed transportation system. The
CONEG Governors strongly believe that the unique planning and funding
requirements of a passenger rail network require federal leadership
and funding to preserve and further develop intercity passenger rail
in the 21st Century.
Intercity passenger rail offers opportunities for improved
mobility, options, and access in travel corridors across the nation.
Investments which improve the quality of intercity passenger rail
service contribute to better performance by other modes and improved
economic competitiveness. Intercity passenger rail can also stimulate
economic and community development by increasing mobility, creating
jobs, and influencing decisions on business and housing location.
The Northeast Corridor and its feeder lines are a critical
component of the transportation network which provides mobility and
contributes to economic development throughout the Atlantic Coast
region. In this densely populated region, passenger rail is an
environmentally sound and energy efficient component of a
comprehensive transportation system. This Corridor network - a public
asset owned by the federal and state governments - is one of the
nation's premier transportation corridors as well as the world's most
complex and heavily used transportation corridor. Efficient use of the
Northeast Corridor and its feeders dramatically affects the overall
viability of the highway, aviation and freight and commuter rail
transportation networks which serve the region and the nation. For
example, using intercity passenger rail for shorter trips in the
Northeast helps manage congestion at some of the nation's busiest
airports by allowing scarce airport slots to be used for more
efficient, longer distance flights. In addition, the recent disruption
of the nation's aviation networks vividly illustrates the importance
of intercity passenger rail in providing critical mobility in the
nation's transportation system, as more travelers continue to turn to
intercity passenger rail. Attention should be paid to maintaining the
Corridor in safe condition by addressing the backlog of modernization
and safety needs, especially by escalating the safety improvements of
the critical tunnels accessing Penn Station in New York City as well
as in Baltimore. Preserving the critical infrastructure of this
multi-state asset is important to the national economy.
We urge the federal government to be a strong consistent partner in
providing policy leadership and stable, long-term funding for
intercity passenger rail, just as it has for the highways, public
transportation, aviation and water transportation systems which
promote the efficient movement of people and goods. At the same time,
States recognize their responsibility to provide a share of financial
investment for services which promote state and regional economies.
Throughout the Northeast and Atlantic Coast region, States have
invested hundreds of millions of dollars in projects that have
improved passenger and freight rail systems serving state, multi-state
and national interests.
Intercity passenger rail corridors, with their need for coordinated
planning and investment strategies, require predictable, long term
federal financing tools which recognize the specific skills,
experiences, and institutions of the funding partners. A strong
federal partner, stable and effectively designed investment tools, and
collaborative institutional arrangements will, over time, enhance the
States' ability to build long-term, comprehensive regional rail
strategies which can capture the economic, social and environmental
benefits of the rail alternative.
Intercity passenger rail has repeatedly demonstrated its vital
contribution to the Northeast's transportation system and the region's
economic well-being. The model of incremental investment in intercity
passenger rail by state, federal and private partnerships is being
repeated across the nation. These successes are now jeopardized by the
cumulative effects of competing demands on inadequate capital
resources. New approaches to generating significant and sustained
capital investment are required to ensure safe, reliable and efficient
intercity passenger rail service.
As the Congress considers rail funding legislation, the FY2003
budget and appropriations, and Amtrak reauthorization, the CONEG
Governors urge the Administration to:
- commit federal policy support for intercity passenger rail as
part of the nation's integrated transportation system;
- ensure adequate, sustained and dedicated capital funding to
support and maintain infrastructure and other critical assets
needed for intercity passenger rail, while preserving the
integrity of the Highway Trust Fund; and
- create new program and financing tools which encourage effective
federal, state and private sector partnerships for coordinated
development and funding of intercity passenger rail corridors.
The Northeast States have gained significant experience and unique
insights into the policy, financing and institutional issues facing
public and private sector partnerships for intercity passenger rail.
We welcome the opportunity for policy staff and transportation
officials from our states and the Department to meet and discuss our
common interests. We have asked Anne Stubbs, CONEG Executive Director,
to contact your office to arrange a meeting as soon as possible.
Regards,
George E. Pataki
Chair
Governor of New York
|
Howard Dean, M.D.
Vice Chair
Governor of Vermont
|
John G. Rowland
Governor of Connecticut
|
Angus S. King, Jr.
Governor of Maine |
Jane Swift
Governor of Massachusetts
|
Jeanne Shaheen
Governor of New Hampshire |
Donald
T. DiFrancesco
Acting Governor of New Jersey |
Lincoln Almond
Governor of Rhode Island |
Similar
letters were sent to Congressional Leadership.
|